* Simon Richter (sjr@debian.org) wrote: > Torsten Landschoff schrieb: > > > Suggestions how to fix that for real before getting sarge out of the > > door with this risk that I don't feel I can estimate? > > Build a dumy libldap.so.2 with the same SONAME that consists of a NEEDED > entry for libldap_r.so.2 only. Completely breaks dlopen()'ings of libldap2. Don't know if there are any in sarge but don't see any reason to break them if there are. Stephen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature