Re: /usr/lib vs /usr/libexec
Le mardi 10 mai 2005 à 10:21 +0200, GOMBAS Gabor a écrit :
> On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 05:42:31AM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
>
> > > - / can't be on lvm, raid0, raid5, reiserfs, xfs without causing
> > > problems for /boot.
> >
> > Why is that?
>
> Missing bootloader support.
Which bootloader doesn't support reiserfs?
> $ du -sh /etc/gconf
> 26M /etc/gconf
>
> That's 1/3 of my root fs. It's damn too much.
Almost all the schemas were already moved out to /usr/share. We plan to
move the defaults directory structure to /var/lib/gconf after the
release - at least, the defaults brought by package; we have to keep a
defaults structure in /etc for local modifications.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\
: :' : josselin.mouette@ens-lyon.org
`. `' joss@debian.org
`- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
Reply to: