[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: lintian & linda (was: Automatic testing of Debian packages)



Hello Emanuele,

* Emanuele Rocca <ema@debian.org> [2005-04-12 07:53]:
> * [ 11-04-05 - 22:03 ] Nico Golde <nico@ngolde.de> wrote: 
> >  * Martin Schulze <joey@infodrom.org> [2005-04-11 22:00]:
> >  > Why are there Vi and Emacs?
> >  > Why are there Perl and Python?
> >  [...] 
> >  But thats not my problem. The programs etc. you showed are very
> >  different in using, look etc.
> >  What I dont know is what is the difference except the programming
> >  language in the case of lintian and linda.
> >  Nobody told me yet.
> 
> Well some differences came out:
> 
> - linda has proper l10n strings for most errors (in German)
> - different output formats
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/04/msg00484.html
> 
> - different test sets
> - linda is faster
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/04/msg00489.html


Ok thanks for sum up the points!
Regards and thanks to all
Nico
-- 
Nico Golde - 310777820@ICQ | GPG: 1024D/73647CFF
http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http://grml.org 
VIM has two modes - the one in which it beeps 
and the one in which it doesn't -- encrypted mail preferred

Attachment: pgpFzRc8p0wRF.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: