On Mon, 2005-03-14 at 16:10 +0000, Scott James Remnant wrote: > On Mon, 2005-03-14 at 16:51 +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > > > On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 15:41:16 +0000, Scott James Remnant > > <scott@netsplit.com> wrote: > > >On Mon, 2005-03-14 at 15:38 +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > > >> It does a significant number of other things, one of them being paying > > >> a number of Debian developers to work on Ubuntu and obviously keeping > > >> them _that_ busy that they neither have time to continue working on > > >> Debian nor to resign from the Debian roles they still hold without > > >> having time to fulfil them. > > >> > > >Are you thinking of any particular developers here? > > > > For example, it suspiciously looks like the Security Team only has one > > public active member, Martin Schulze, since at least October 2004. > > As far as I know, the other people being publicly visible as active > > members of the Security Team in the time before October 2004, are now > > working for Ubuntu. > > > Given there were only two active members before that, you're still only > making an accusation against a single person -- while attributing it to > an entire staff of ~30 people. > It should be pointed out that of these 30-odd people, only 8 or so actually work on the Ubuntu distribution. Scott -- Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part