Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 11:26:07AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Sven Luther (sven.luther@wanadoo.fr) [050314 11:20]:
> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 10:39:24AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 08:45:09PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > > - the port must demonstrate that they have at least 50 users
>
> > > How do you demonstrate that? Via popularity-contest?
>
> > But then, popularity-contest installation per default was dropped for
> > debian-installer rc3, so ...
>
> We don't say "it needs 50 entries in popularity-contest", but just: 50
> users. How this is demonstrated, may be different. Enough traffic on the
> porter list might also be enough - or enough bug reports coming from
> that arch. Or whatever. I don't expect that to be the blocking critieria
> for any arch.
I believe that kfreebsd-gnu matches all the mentioned requirements [1] except
this one. There are quite many bug reports for this system (hundreds) but
most of them come from me ;). If you could be more specific, that'd be much
appreciated.
[1] Of course, we don't have the DD signatures yet, but there are more than 5
DDs working on this so there's no problem collecting them.
--
.''`. Proudly running Debian GNU/kFreeBSD unstable/unreleased (on UFS2+S)
: :' :
`. `' http://www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-gnu
`-
Reply to: