[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [SoftwareSuspend-devel] 2.1-final for 2.6.8.1



[CC: the ITP bug #292479 (http://bugs.debian.org/292479)]

also sprach Erich Schubert <erich.schubert@gmail.com> [2005.02.28.2009 +0100]:
> The patch will not be included in Debian kernels, but will be used
> by the user to build his own kernel. Which will likely be not pure
> modular, but maybe just break swsusp.

This is a problem anyone using the patch will face. And anyone using
any patch faces this problem.

Btw: can't the swsusp2 patch force USB module support? I see it with
other kernel options. E.g. switching SCSI from y to m will
automatically force all SCSI drivers to be m as well.

> Heck, just let them get a recent kernel and be much better off!
> Put the kernel and the swsusp patch into "volatile".

I'll consider it.

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`.     martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
: :'  :    proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
 
Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: