Re: Let's remove mips, mipsel, s390, ...
Thiemo Seufer <ica2_ts@csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> writes:
> Those would need to go into experimental, where no buildd problem
> exists by definition.
>
>
> Thiemo
Except for the 11 archs with experimental buildds.
MfG
Goswin
Reply to:
- References:
- [Fwd: Re: GTK+2.0 2.6.2-3 and buildds running out of space]
- From: Clint Byrum <cbyrum@spamaps.org>
- Let's remove mips, mipsel, s390, ... (Was: [Fwd: Re: GTK+2.0 2.6.2-3 and buildds running out of space])
- From: Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org>
- Re: Let's remove mips, mipsel, s390, ... (Was: [Fwd: Re: GTK+2.0 2.6.2-3 and buildds running out of space])
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: Let's remove mips, mipsel, s390, ... (Was: [Fwd: Re: GTK+2.0 2.6.2-3 and buildds running out of space])
- From: Brian Nelson <pyro@debian.org>
- Re: Let's remove mips, mipsel, s390, ... (Was: [Fwd: Re: GTK+2.0 2.6.2-3 and buildds running out of space])
- From: Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org>
- Re: Let's remove mips, mipsel, s390, ... (Was: [Fwd: Re: GTK+2.0 2.6.2-3 and buildds running out of space])
- From: Thiemo Seufer <ica2_ts@csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de>