Re: LCC and blobs

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: LCC and blobs
From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)
Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 13:33:09 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20050109123309.GC9560@wonderland.linux.it>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-legal@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 41DF7214.5040905@verizon.net>
References: <41D5CC67.60605@derobert.net> <874qi2jf3y.fsf@kreon.lan.henning.makholm.net> <41D5E555.7000405@derobert.net> <[🔎] 87u0q1eebv.fsf@aule.evenmere.org> <[🔎] 41DCD6EB.80602@derobert.net> <[🔎] 41DDBFA8.9020405@verizon.net> <[🔎] 20050106232934.GA17082@wonderland.linux.it> <[🔎] 41DDE25D.8030903@verizon.net> <[🔎] 20050107203447.GA16985@wonderland.linux.it> <[🔎] 41DF7214.5040905@verizon.net>

On Jan 08, Josh Triplett <josh.trip@verizon.net> wrote:

> atmel-firmware .  Would you argue that at76c503a-source should neither
> Depends: nor Recommends: atmel-firmware ?  If so, why?  If you changed
Yes. Read the debian-legal@ archive if you care about the details.

-- 
ciao,
Marco

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Why does Debian distributed firmware not need to be Depends: upon? [was Re: LCC and blobs]
  - From: Don Armstrong <don@debian.org>

References:
- Re: LCC and blobs
  - From: Brian Thomas Sniffen <bts@alum.mit.edu>
- Re: LCC and blobs
  - From: Anthony DeRobertis <anthony@derobert.net>
- Re: LCC and blobs
  - From: Josh Triplett <josh.trip@verizon.net>
- Re: LCC and blobs
  - From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)
- Re: LCC and blobs
  - From: Josh Triplett <josh.trip@verizon.net>
- Re: LCC and blobs
  - From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)
- Re: LCC and blobs
  - From: Josh Triplett <josh.trip@verizon.net>

Prev by Date: Please test exim4 4.43 in experimental
Next by Date: Re: APT Repository HOWTO
Previous by thread: Re: LCC and blobs
Next by thread: Why does Debian distributed firmware not need to be Depends: upon? [was Re: LCC and blobs]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread