[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Is anyone packaging `lame' ?



cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
> as current EU legislation explicitly forbids software-patents[1] none of 
> those are currently legal. _If_ we loose the current legaslitive battle 
> that might change, but sofar we seem to be winning (be it with some close 
> calls  countering the underhanded maneuvers of the pro-patent lobby).
Even though they're illegal, the amount of money it takes to *prove* that to a
patent court is more than most F/OSS projects have.


-- 
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GAT/CM$/CS>$/CC/IT$/M/S/O/U dpu s+:++ !a C++$>C+++$
UB+++>++++$L++++$*-- P+>++$ L+++(++++)$ E-(---) W+++>$ N(+) o? K-
w--(---) O? M V? PS++@ PE-@ Y+@ PGP++(+++)>$ t? 5? X? R tv--(-)
b++(+++)@ DI? D? G e->++++ h* r? z*
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

David Mandelberg
mandelbergd@eth0.is-a-geek.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: