Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activity monitor
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 12:42:05AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 04:13:54PM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 12:26:17AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> wrote:
> > > Umm, only if it is indeed deemed to be illegal. So far, there
> > > has been just FUD about this issue. I am not sure that artistic work
> > > qualifies as porn, which seems to be the case here.
> >
> > Artistic or not, the pictures in hot-babe are *not* porn.
>
> To quote Manoj, "And you are who, the culture police?"
>
> I think it's a matter of opinion. I agree with you, but state
> your opinion as such rather than fact please.
Give me *one* authoritative definition of pornography that applies to
this picture. Until you give me one, I'll consider all the ones I've
seen so far to be the accurate ones, and none of them say these pictures
are pornography.
Mike
Reply to: