On Thursday 02 December 2004 12:47, David Schleef wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 08:03:42AM +0000, Helen Faulkner wrote:
> > Yes, you are being absurd. Since you are presumably not understanding
> > the point, let me explain more clearly:
> >
> > Pornography is widely regarded as being demeaning and insulting to
> > women.
> It's a pretty common feeling to dislike something you don't
> understand. Especially when repeatedly told to dislike it. Perhaps
> the porn by itself is neutral, and the oppresive cluture around it
> is what causes it to be demeaning.
hear, hear
> (btw, is gay porn demeaning to women?)
or femdom porn (if so I'd _really_ like to hear the reasoning behind that
verdict)
--
Cheers, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)
1. Encrypted mail preferred (GPG KeyID: 0x86624ABB)
2. Plain-text mail recommended since I move html and double
format mails to a low priority folder (they're mainly spam)
Attachment:
pgp3k_CUk__1T.pgp
Description: PGP signature