Re: Finding an improved release process.

To: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Finding an improved release process.
From: Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder <avbidder@fortytwo.ch>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 13:37:51 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 200411291337.51918@fortytwo.ch>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20041129093757.GT30627@mails.so.argh.org>
References: <[🔎] 200411271334.09983.alexeijh@westnet.com.au> <[🔎] codmqi$gar$1@news.cistron.nl> <[🔎] 20041129093757.GT30627@mails.so.argh.org>

On Monday 29 November 2004 10.37, Andreas Barth wrote:

> Trust me - it is not that any of those architectures blocks our release
> process. We don't have _any_ testing-security autobuilder, including
> none on i386.

Is it a problem of missing machines (but I can't really believe that)?

-- vbi

-- 
TODO: apt-get install signify

Attachment: pgpKjyRQnaeup.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

References:
- Finding an improved release process.
  - From: alexeijh@westnet.com.au
- Re: Finding an improved release process.
  - From: "Miquel van Smoorenburg" <miquels@cistron.nl>
- Re: Finding an improved release process.
  - From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Finding an improved release process.
Next by Date: Bug#283493: ITP: ossp-uuid -- OSSP uuid ISO-C and Perl application programming interface
Previous by thread: Re: Finding an improved release process.
Next by thread: Re: Finding an improved release process.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread