On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 06:59:15PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: > Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> wrote: > > The apt rsync method (begining of 128818) for packages updates, of > > which there are several fully working versions out too, does put a big > > strain on mirrors and is realy no suitable. > There was also an ITP for a client-side rsync method that puts the load > on the client side, and which was intended to solve the same problem, > eventually. I didn't bother to read the details, though. Aren't there patent issues related to flipping the rsync protocol around? -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature