Re: dselect survey
Jens Peter Secher <jps@debian.org> writes:
> > Popcon says (rank by vote)
> > #rank name inst vote old recent no-files (maintainer)
> > 371 dselect 5783 1310 3162 1310 1 (Dpkg Development)
>
> Yes, I was not very clear. What I really meant was "who uses the
> full-screen interface of dselect?".
<survey>
I used dselect [0.53] weeks ago.
(-1 means it was so long ago that I don't remember or never did).
</survey>
And that means the full-screen interface.
>From time to time I give a try to aptitude and synaptic, but always recoil
in horror. I don't know what the fuss is about aptitude, IMHO it's way
more complicated to use than dselect, and less clear as well. As for
synaptic, I've never been able to use it for more than 5 minutes without
it crashing with a segfault. Not the kind of behavior I'd expect from my
package manager frontend of choice. Oh, I use the presumedly "stable"
version that comes with Woody.
Dselect has always been very stable and reliable to me. My only concern
of it is its lack of features; those that it knows, knows well, but I
wouldn't mind indeed if someone could soup it up a bit. But even in its
current state, it's a worthy tool. However, I also think that it would be
more logical to remove it from dpkg, and put it in its own package.
Regards,
Gergo
Reply to: