Re: Drop testing

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Drop testing
From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 14:08:34 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20041028120834.GG21711@mails.so.argh.org>
Mail-followup-to: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 871xfjry7u.fsf@peder.flower>
References: <[🔎] 1098433251.4178c2e34eedb@imp4-q.free.fr> <[🔎] 20041022093613.GA5732@zombie.inka.de> <[🔎] 20041023105636.GA5849@zombie.inka.de> <[🔎] 1652447.0X1vLig1ER@sercond.dubki.ru> <[🔎] 20041024160330.GB1090@azure.humbug.org.au> <[🔎] 87ekjmva00.fsf@becket.becket.net> <[🔎] 871xfjry7u.fsf@peder.flower>

* Jan Nieuwenhuizen (janneke@gnu.org) [041028 14:05]:
> Thomas Bushnell writes:

> > So the RC bugs should not be blocking release unless they are *new* RC
> > bugs which don't already exist.
 
> I'd word that a bit differently: the definition of an RC bug should
> *never* allow a bug still present in stable now (+ security.stable) to
> reach the level of RC.

We _have_ RC-bugs in woody - even RC-bugs we won't fix.


Cheers,
Andi
-- 
   http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
   PGP 1024/89FB5CE5  DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F  3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C

Reply to:

References:
- Ubuntu discussion at planet.debian.org
  - From: Jérôme Marant <jmarant@free.fr>
- Re: Ubuntu discussion at planet.debian.org
  - From: Eduard Bloch <edi@gmx.de>
- Drop testing
  - From: Eduard Bloch <edi@gmx.de>
- Re: Drop testing
  - From: "Nikita V. Youshchenko" <yoush@cs.msu.su>
- Re: Drop testing
  - From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: Drop testing
  - From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: Drop testing
  - From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org>

Prev by Date: Versioned bugs in the BTS (was: Drop testing)
Next by Date: Re: Location of Type 1 fonts
Previous by thread: Re: Drop testing
Next by thread: Re: Drop testing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread