Re: Ubuntu discussion at planet.debian.org
* Marcelo E. Magallon (mmagallo@debian.org) [041026 09:35]:
> On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 01:37:21AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > > Okay, it's a month old, but there hasn't been any since.
> > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2004/09/msg00005.html
> > > "We are also still missing official autobuilders for
> > > testing-proposed-updates on alpha and mips. All other architectures
> > > appear to be keeping up with t-p-u uploads."
> > Missing a buildd on an arch or too is a far cry from t-p-u
> > being unsupported.
> Testing is by design all-or-nothing. As long as a single architecture
> hasn't buildd support for t-p-u, the buildd support for t-p-u is as
> good as missing. You could do builds by hand, but then again, how many
> developers actually do that?
And, please don't do it. We definitly can't release without official
buildds for all architectures, so please no binary-only uploads in t-p-u
(if the release team would consider different, I'd have started building
mips and alpha there long ago).
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
Reply to: