On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 02:35:20PM -0700, Adam McKenna wrote: > On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 11:27:57PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 09:47:50AM -0700, Adam McKenna wrote: > > > No, but sending role account mail direct-to-MX from a dialup account is > > > braindead, as it is well known that dialup addresses are blocked by many > > > hosts on the internet. > > It could equally well be said that those filtering mail from people they > > requested a reply from in the first place are braindead. > I think it's reasonable to expect that someone occupying a role account of > any importance will not (or at least should not) be sending direct-to-MX > mail from a dynamic IP. Really? I think it's bullshit. They're not responsible for your filtering decisions; if you're initiating a dialogue with someone, it's your problem, not theirs, to ensure that you're not filtering their responses. > So the issue becomes "which is more braindead". Obviously, this is > where our opinions differ. Looks like it. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature