Re: Frank Carmickle and Marco Paganini must die
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 03:09:57PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 09:44:29 -0700, Adam McKenna <adam@flounder.net> said:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 07:19:06PM +0300, Petri Latvala wrote:
> >> Umm. Why is it that it's automatically the sender that has to do
> >> some changes in this scenario? If you are stuck with such an ISP,
> >> use a webmail service (This same advice has been given by the
> >> "fault is on sender's side" people). Want a gmail invite? =)
>
> > I agree with that, but some people may not even be aware that their
> > ISP is doing this.
>
> > Us technical people, however, *do* know that lots of ISP's block
> > messages from these hosts. That is why I think it's a bad idea to
> > run a mail server on a dynamic IP.
>
> You have a right to consider whatever you want a bad idea. I
> consider eating the sacred earth mother cow's holy flesh a bad idea,
> but does that mean we boycott mickey D's?
Manoj, when you bring up the sacred mother cow, I think we can tell the
thread has gone far enough.
Let's just agree to disagree.
--Adam
--
Adam McKenna <adam@debian.org> <adam@flounder.net>
Reply to: