On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 02:48:39PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > Absolutely agree. I'd add there requent changing package AND beta releases > which are subject to frequent changes (e.g. mozilla subprojects and so on). We have experimental for that. "Volatile" would, in my estimation, be for stuff that is downright dangerous or absolutely useless a year later. The only reason Mozilla in woody fits this criteria is that it was pretty buggy, nasty, early-cycle code. I don't think that Mozilla now fits that bill (at least, I can easily imagine myself using my current version of Firefox in two years time). - Matt
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature