On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 12:25:42AM -0700, Adam McKenna wrote: > On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 01:54:50AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > Since when has the refusal to pander to a moronic mail > > filtering scheme by people too incompetent to manage their incoming > > email been a sign of unprofessionalism, btw? > > When you don't make a reasonable effort to contact a person, even though his > ISP may implement a bad filtering scheme (in your eyes), when it is part of > the duties of your role, you are not fulfilling your duties. That person's > perception will be that he was ignored. How is sending an SMTP-conformant message to the address listed in the From: or Reply-To: fields of a message you receive not a "reasonable effort"? Some people percieve that I am the anti-christ. Would you like to pander to their delusions as well? - Matt
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature