[OT] Re: ..Debian rejects Microsoft's "Sender ID" on contractual terms

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: [OT] Re: ..Debian rejects Microsoft's "Sender ID" on contractual terms
From: Justin Pryzby <justinpryzby@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 15:56:06 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 20040908195606.GD23928@andromeda>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20040908212653.6b5b9a96.arnt@c2i.net>
References: <[🔎] 200409090201.28397.russell@coker.com.au> <[🔎] 20040908212653.6b5b9a96.arnt@c2i.net>

On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 09:26:53PM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:

> ..http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20040905212754195
> and, to get on-topic everywhere ;-) : Is there a smtp rejection 
> code for "I accept no shit from Wintendo"mail" boxes!" ? 
~/.procmailrc:
:0
* ^X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook
/dev/null

Justin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

References:
- Debian rejects Sender ID
  - From: Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au>
- ..Debian rejects Microsoft's "Sender ID" on contractual terms
  - From: Arnt Karlsen <arnt@c2i.net>

Prev by Date: ..Debian rejects Microsoft's "Sender ID" on contractual terms
Next by Date: Re: Incorrect use of "it's" in package control files -- file mass bug?
Previous by thread: ..Debian rejects Microsoft's "Sender ID" on contractual terms
Next by thread: Re: ..Debian rejects Microsoft's "Sender ID" on contractual terms
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread