Re: The unofficial buildd effort and its shutdown - my POV
On Sun, Sep 05, 2004 at 01:14:04PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Ingo Juergensmann <ij@2004.bluespice.org> writes:
>
> > Every time I looked at the NM process it looked to me as a process about
> > package maintaining. Because this is not what I'm going to do, I turned
> > away. Quite simple.
>
> You did not look very carefully then, did you? Please read:
> http://www.debian.org/devel/join/nm-step4.
>
> You sort it out with the Application Manager. Of course, "manage a
> buildd" isn't on the list, but that's because it's uncommon. The page
No, but "* Infrastructure" is close enough, imho.
> goes out of its way to make clear that other tasks are fine if you
> work them out with the AM and the NM-committee.
Indeed.
[snip]
> Have you been fighting with James for several years to become a DD?
> Or are you just predicting that it's necessary? James is pretty easy
> to get along with if you don't harass him, in my experience.
Agreed. Of course, those who enter a discussion with the mindset that
"The person I'm going to discuss with is going to treat me like shit,
so I better be aggressive or defensive" isn't really helping things...
Regards: David Weinehall
--
/) David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se> /) Northern lights wander (\
// Maintainer of the v2.0 kernel // Dance across the winter sky //
\) http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/ (/ Full colour fire (/
Reply to: