On Sat, Sep 04, 2004 at 04:07:37PM -0500, Robin Verduijn wrote: > On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 12:39:25AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > > mcvs_1.0.8-4 > Meta-CVS has failed for over a year to get into testing due to a bug in > clisp. Since that[1] does not seem to be actively worked on fixing (by > the clisp maintainer nor by the mips porters), the only way for mcvs > to propagate to testing now is if its MIPS package is removed from the > testing archives. I filed a bug[2] for that almost 3 months ago. Should > I bump its severity up higher (it's now "serious") or will that make no > difference? I don't imagine it makes a difference. Severities are a rather fuzzy concept where ftp.debian.org is concerned. You may want to get mcvs added to P-a-s (http://buildd.debian.org/quinn-diff-Packages-arch-specific), as this makes the case for removal from the archive clearer. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature