On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 08:33 +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 04:08:43PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > This is the sane thing to do IMHO as well. Please don't ship a /etc/ethers, > > since it is a simple enough file, documented well enough in ethers(5), which > > in turn is documented by everything that would use such a file (or should, > > anyway). > > I agree, however I wonder why nobody argues against that. I can think of a > standpoint where it makes sense, that it is good to have all config files > which are interpreted to be generated and possibly filled with some comments > including samples, pointer to usage and documentation. put an "example file" in the docs dir. We do that for everything else around here. Why not /etc/ethers or what have you. > Well, but since I have two agreements and no nays, I will go ahead and close > the open wishlist bug. With a wontfix. Agree that it should be without a dummy in /etc -- greg, greg@gregfolkert.net The technology that is Stronger, better, faster: Linux
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part