On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 04:48:11PM +0200, Dalibor Topic wrote: > Justin Pryzby wrote: > >On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 04:10:09PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote: > >>On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 07:40:27AM +0200, Sami Dalouche wrote: > >>And people wonder why I don't like Java... > > > >Can someone explain to me why "java foo.class" has to fail with an > >obscure error? (You're not suppoed to specify .class) Jeez. > >Can we at least have kaffe and friends give a pretty message? > > That's a nice idea, actually. I've opened a bug [1] and am presently testing a patch. > [1] Usual taintedness conditions apply, i.e. you should not have signed > NDAs preventing you from contributing, looked at Sun's SCSL covered > code, decompiled it, etc. Gawd no. Thanks, Justin References [1] http://bugs.debian.org/269816
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature