On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 01:17:15PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: > > linux-kernel-headers is pseudo-build-essential by virtue of being a > > dependency of libc6-dev. Do not include unnecessary build-dependencies > > on it. Why do people keep thinking they should be messing with this > > package? > > *blink*. It's 2.6 only. If it exists, it means glibc contains 2.6 kernel > headers. If it doesn't exist, it means it's an older glibc, containing > 2.4 kernel headers. It doesn't sound very unnecessary to me. The other > alternative is a versioned glibc build-dep, but this just seems easier. Unless you're claiming to have invented time travel, that is stunningly irrelevant. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature