Re: Firefox and Sarge

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Firefox and Sarge
From: Andrew Pollock <apollock@debian.org>
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 20:14:39 +1000
Message-id: <[🔎] 20040902101438.GA13846@daedalus.andrew.net.au>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20040901191338.GA5019@suffields.me.uk>
References: <20040820062246.GA20946@vaio.glandium.org> <20040821225015.GB26868@daedalus.andrew.net.au> <20040824075202.GB10782@ba.issia.cnr.it> <20040825013129.GA26857@daedalus.andrew.net.au> <[🔎] 20040901190002.GA28033@quux.local> <[🔎] 20040901191338.GA5019@suffields.me.uk>

On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 08:13:38PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> 
> There is no evidence to support the theory that *any* date is
> feasible. There are no recorded instances of Debian meeting a
> deadline.

How about we set a precedent then?

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Firefox and Sarge
  - From: Graham Wilson <graham@debian.org>

References:
- Re: Firefox and Sarge
  - From: Graham Wilson <bob@decoy.wox.org>
- Re: Firefox and Sarge
  - From: Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: FTFBS in sarge
Next by Date: NFS permissions skewed with linux 2.6 client
Previous by thread: Re: Firefox and Sarge
Next by thread: Re: Firefox and Sarge
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread