On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 04:08:48PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > >> The urgency is to get the sarge sources to build for amd64 so the > >> amd64 release deviates as little as possible from the official sarge > >> and the RM team has agreed to allow such changes through t-p-u. > > Please refresh my memory re: where this was agreed to. I don't remember > > anyone being given carte blanche to upload amd64-specific changes to > > t-p-u, and I certainly don't think we've said anything to suggest we > > want to be used as a weapon when arguing with maintainers about amd64 > > support. > A while back I asked on irc if it was ok to get minimal changes like > adding amd64 to the Architecture list or similar non intrusive patches > that don't affect !amd64 uploaded and was told that it would be ok for > t-p-u (implying that they wouldnt just be rejected because they don't > affect official release archs). Non-intrusive changes are ok, but not implicitly approved; and not over objections from package maintainers. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature