Re: Bug#241689: I'm going to NMU this
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#241689: I'm going to NMU this
- From: Marc Haber <mh+debian-devel@zugschlus.de>
- Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2004 20:04:30 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] E1C2ZTX-0006KX-5x@torres.ka0.zugschlus.de>
- In-reply-to: <E1C25aQ-0000jY-00@sledge.mossbank.org.uk>
- References: <E1C1QyD-00085t-2y@dual> <1093796769.15494.25.camel@descent.netsplit.com> <874qmlhnwq.fsf@mrvn.homelinux.org> <20040829182218.GD20591@bignachos.com> <87r7poeoyf.fsf@mrvn.homelinux.org> <87r7poeoyf.fsf@mrvn.homelinux.org> <20040831030919.GG458@riva.ucam.org> <E1C25aQ-0000jY-00@sledge.mossbank.org.uk>
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 11:09:58 +0100, Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com>
wrote:
>Colin Watson writes:
>>On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 03:27:04PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>>> PS: I suppose you also want to bann everyone that uploaded a binary
>>> porting NMU for me and remove all those uploads (which might be a 4
>>> digit number by now)
>>
>>I definitely do not think that any binary upload should ever be
>>sponsored, full stop. If it were feasible to do so I would prefer that
>>those uploads be removed, as in this case the cure is worse than the
>>disease; since it's probably not feasible, I would simply like this
>>practice to stop immediately.
>
>Seconded.
You are aware that many buildds are run by non-DDs and thus need
sponsored binary uploads to get the debs into the archive? Removing
all sponsored binaries means removing most of m68k, for example, if I
recall correctly.
Greetings
Marc
--
-------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -----
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Karlsruhe, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | Fon: *49 721 966 32 15
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fax: *49 721 966 31 29
Reply to: