Re: ,deb's follow Packages files to mirrors: nuts or what?
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: ,deb's follow Packages files to mirrors: nuts or what?
- From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 12:50:22 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20040901105022.GB3463@uio.no>
- Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <20040901000937.GA28280@riva.ucam.org>
- References: <87vff5w8m1.fsf@jidanni.org> <20040829020805.GC383@rei.moonkingdom.net> <20040829221853.GA32298@chastell.shot.pl> <87n00curz7.fsf@jidanni.org> <874qmjl9mh.fsf@mrvn.homelinux.org> <87zn4b2k2m.fsf@jidanni.org> <20040831233331.GA27038@riva.ucam.org> <87k6veambh.fsf@becket.becket.net> <20040901000937.GA28280@riva.ucam.org>
On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 01:09:37AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> Yeah, that would make sense. Anyone want to implement that in debmirror?
> :-)
Is it worth it, given that the archive is going to be split in parts anyhow?
ftpmasters (if anybody is lurking on the list; this isn't important enough
for a Cc ;-) ), is this being considered along with the architecture split?
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
Reply to: