On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 02:18:46AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> There doesn't seem to have been an announcement here about it when
> libtiff4 hit unstable. Better late than never. The new libtiff4
> package has been in unstable for several days, and is available on all
> architectures. Some people have already started uploading fixed
> versions of their packages; if you maintain a package affected by this
> transition and haven't reuploaded yet, your cooperation is appreciated.
> You are encouraged to upload your rebuild-only packages with a medium
> urgency, to help make this transition as quick as possible.
I'm a maintainer of asc which depends on libtiff3.
However it depends indirectly by libsdl-image1.2-dev.
SDL has been uploaded yesterday with the fixed dependencies, but with a low
priority. What will happen if I will upload my package with the medium
priority? I think it's useless cause it will have to wait for libsdl.
Any hints for unexperienced maintainer? ;)
regards
fEnIo
--
_ Bartosz Fenski | mailto:fenio@o2.pl | pgp:0x13fefc40 | IRC:fEnIo
_|_|_ 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Polska
(0 0) phone:+48602383548 | Slackware - the weakest link
ooO--(_)--Ooo http://skawina.eu.org | JID:fenio@jabber.org | RLU:172001
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature