Re: amd64 and sarge
Raul Miller <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> > Bi-arch being less painful than multiarch, in my
>> > opinion -- it needs to touch far fewer packages:
>> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-amd64/2004/07/msg00244.html
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 09:47:31PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Biarch needs all packages to change. I repeat: _all_.
> We already went over this.
> Yes, one way of doing biarch requires all packages to change.
> The above url is a proposal which presents a different way
> of doing biarch.
No it doesn't. The packages needing changes you list are all core
packages and all non core amd64 packages. Meaning all packages.
See my other reply for details.
>> If you read/hear/say anything else its just not true.
> You aren't presenting any useful information here.
> If you'd like to offer specific criticisms of the above
> proposal, I'd be interested in hearing them.