[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: PROPOSAL: Communication to solve the dispute.

On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 11:30:28PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org> writes:
> >> This is a no-op by rule of the constitution.

> Might be a no-op but its an ultimatum of a sort.
> You could formulate it as:

>   That the developers in charge for adding the architecture identified by
>   dpkg as "amd64", hereinafter "amd64", to the "unstable" archive, is
>   violating the constituion and is warned to follow it.

> Is that less of a no-op?

No, then it's just a lie.

Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: