Re: -= PROPOSAL =- Release sarge with amd64
On Mon, 2004-07-26 at 18:57, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include <hallo.h>
> * Matt Zimmerman [Mon, Jul 26 2004, 10:32:58AM]:
>
> > > *cough* are you beeing serious? All the time in the last 10 days I have
> > > not seen any concrete and constructive posting from our DPL.
> >
> > Did you pick 10 days as an arbitrary interval which would not include his
> > statement on this issue in <[🔎] 20040707114550.GA12096@deprecation.cyrius.com>?
> > (7 July).
>
> No. I could even say "in July" but it would not make any difference
> since this posting is exactly what I talk about: pseudo arguments which
> are either already known (and expected and proofed as non-sense) or SEP.
That message from the DPL says:
There are 3 issues which have to be clarified and taken care of before
AMD64 can move into the archive:
...
- Some technical AMD64 questions: ftpmaster had some specific
questions about the AMD64 port they want to see answered.
...
I never saw anywhere a post of what those questions were. Was there
one?
--
Oliver Elphick olly@lfix.co.uk
Isle of Wight http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
GPG: 1024D/A54310EA 92C8 39E7 280E 3631 3F0E 1EC0 5664 7A2F A543 10EA
========================================
"If any of you lack wisdom, let him ask of God, that
giveth to all men liberally, and upbraideth not; and
it shall be given him." James 1:5
Reply to: