Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> writes: > Upstream has already decided to support mudflap in GCC 3.5, which is > even more far-reaching than SSP. I'm not sure whether all users of SSP would he happy with mudflap as a replacement. It has a different focus; it was designed as debugging tool. For example it probably incurs a much larger performance overhead, since basically every pointer dereference goes through a hash table. -- Falk