Re: DO NOT REMOVE the lib packages after updates
Matt Zimmerman <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 06:12:35AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Would you advocate uploading libraries with new soname to experimental
>> and getting all reverse depends build against it (also in
>> experimental) so that a transition can then be pushed through within
> I'm not sure. What is the advantage over doing the same thing with
> s/unstable/testing/ and s/experimental/unstable/ ?
Breaking unstable for possibly weaks and preventing any new packages
(that depend on the lib) from entering sarge.