Re: -= PROPOSAL =- Release sarge with amd64
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 15:06:51 -0500, Chris Cheney <ccheney@cheney.cx> said:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 03:11:24PM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 01:55:10PM -0500, Chris Cheney
>> <ccheney@cheney.cx> was heard to say:
>> > If amd64 port has too many port specific rc bugs it simply won't
>> > get released with sarge. It won't significantly prolong the sarge
>> > release if at all.
>>
>> It will if the proposed GR passes, since that forces us to include
>> amd64 in sarge.
> No one really wants this GR to proceed. It seemed to many to be the
> only way to get ftpmaster to respond at all, which it seems to have
> at least partially succeeded at. :\
If the sponsors really believe this, they are displaying a
deplorable error in judgement. I would consider this an abuse of
the constitutional processes, and acting in bad faith.
manoj
--
The new Congressmen say they're going to turn the government around.
I hope I don't get run over again.
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: