Re: -= PROPOSAL =- Release sarge with amd64
* Chris Cheney (ccheney@cheney.cx) [040714 21:55]:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 08:16:59PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > could you please try to not interpret things in Daniel's mail he didn't
> > say? He didn't tell anything about his intentions to communicate about
> > amd64, but just that he doesn't like it if private off-hand remarks
> > are cited in public. And, if this communication was really private
> > (and I have no doubt about that, as you didn't disagree with this
> > statement), I can understand Daniel perfectly well. Please accept that
> > most people doesn't like to get private communication cited in
> > public, and I definitly would stop to give private remarks to somebody
> > who might cite them in public.
> The statemtents were made via /msg on irc but he did not state that the
> information was sensitive at that time. iirc I had told him there were
> people wanting to know what was holding up the addition, I had no reason
> to think the information he was telling me was sensitive either with
> what little details he gave me. I didn't quote him in the email sent to
> the list I just commented on the fact that he told me ftpmaster would be
> making an official statement about what would be happening wrt the
> archive.
Well, obviously there is a massive disagreement about whether the
contents of that talk were private or not.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
Reply to: