Re: -= PROPOSAL =- Release sarge with amd64
* Stephen Frost (sfrost@snowman.net) [040714 21:10]:
> * Andreas Barth (aba@not.so.argh.org) wrote:
> > That is not true. Daniel didn't say that ftpmaster has no intention to
> > comment on the amd64 issue, but just that he has no interesst to
> > communicate with you (as a person) any more, because you cited
> > private, off-hand remarks. Please learn the difference between the two
> > statements.
> Is there some other way to get a remark from the ftpmasters on the
> issue? As rude as it may seem, it appears to have been much more
> effective in getting some comment on the issue than the other ways which
> have been tried. I do note that this is what tbm does to some extent,
> but he's pretty busy. Of course, whomever does the communication would
> have to make it clear that they intended to make it public, as I'm sure
> tbm does either explicitly or implicitly.
Well, than it's not a private, off-hand remark any more. Of course one
can cite other people if they agreed on that.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
Reply to: