Re: -= PROPOSAL =- Release sarge with amd64
When you accused me of interpreting official documents "pedanticaly", I
wondered what you meant exactly with being pedantic.
Thanks for the illustrative example!
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 03:05:54PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>
> Josselin Mouette wrote:
>
> >1. that the next Debian GNU/Linux release, codenamed "sarge", will=20
> > include the "amd64" architecture, based on the work currently hosted=20
> > at http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/ ;
>
> Which point of section 4.1 of the constitution do you believe this falls
> under?
>
> >2. that non-compliance of that "amd64" distribution with the Linux=20
> > Standard Base specification for IA32 will not be considered a=20
> > release-critical bug;
>
> Which point of section 4.1 of the constitution do you believe this falls
> under?
>
> >3. that we will include it immediately in the "sid" distribution and=20
> > auto-building infrastructure, and take all appropriate steps so=20
> > that inclusion won't delay the release of "sarge" any further.
>
> Which point of section 4.1 of the constitution do you believe this falls
> under?
>
> I'm unconvinced that you have the constitutional powers to make
> decisions like this via a GR.
> --
> Matthew Garrett | mjg59-chiark.mail.debian.devel@srcf.ucam.org
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
--
Robert Millan
"[..] but the delight and pride of Aule is in the deed of making, and in the
thing made, and neither in possession nor in his own mastery; wherefore he
gives and hoards not, and is free from care, passing ever on to some new work."
-- J.R.R.T., Ainulindale (Silmarillion)
Reply to: