[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Future of X packages in Debian



On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 04:47:21AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 11:48:24AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 01:20:49PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > The above *does* apply even if a given upstream package changes its
> > > upstream source.  When the Xpm library was incorporated into XFree86
> > > upstream, I expressed my interest in maintaining its packages as part of
> > > XFree86 to the then-current maintainer.  AFAIR, he had no objection.
> > 
> > BTW, what you decided to do at a given time, isn't necessarily
> > Debian-blessed practice.
> 
> So you're asserting that what I work out in mutual agreement with another
> package maintainer, under a procedure countenanced by the Debian
> Developers' Reference[1], "isn't necessarily Debian-blessed practice"?
> 
> Fascinating.

dict necessarily

-- 
Daniel Stone                                                <daniels@debian.org>
Debian: the universal operating system                     http://www.debian.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: