Re: AMD64 for sarge [Re: <rant> Package: ftpmasters, Severity: serious, ...]
>>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org> writes:
Daniel> On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 09:48:12AM -0400, Stephen Frost
Daniel> wrote:
>> The /lib vs. /lib64 hack is bad and wrong
>> and will be going away in favor of multiarch, a much cleaner
>> and more elegant solution.
Daniel> The rest of the universe appears to disagree with the
Daniel> Debian AMD64 porters on this issue, including existing
Daniel> Linux distributions and commercial Unices.
Just because they do it doesn't mean they disagree. Think BetaMAX
versus VHS (if you're that old - othervise look it up :)...
Reply to:
- References:
- <rant> Package: ftpmasters, Severity: serious, ...
- From: Eduard Bloch <blade@debian.org>
- AMD64 for sarge [Re: <rant> Package: ftpmasters, Severity: serious, ...]
- From: Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>
- Re: AMD64 for sarge [Re: <rant> Package: ftpmasters, Severity: serious, ...]
- From: Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project Leader <leader@debian.org>
- Re: AMD64 for sarge [Re: <rant> Package: ftpmasters, Severity: serious, ...]
- From: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
- Re: AMD64 for sarge [Re: <rant> Package: ftpmasters, Severity: serious, ...]
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>