Re: AMD64 for sarge [<rant> Package: ftpmasters, Severity: serious, ...]
According to Andrew Suffield:
> On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 09:25:12AM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
> > Of the three points, I (as one of the folks involved with the BSD ports,
> > at least) am quite willing to grant that amd64 is worthy of special-case
> > treatment because of what it is, and where it's going.
>
> Do I really have to remind people that this was said of ia64, too?
So ia64 is a dud; anyone who wasn't in Intel marketing (or drank their
kool-aid) could see it. You're not suggesting that amd64 is going to
run aground like ia64 did....?
("Remember, they also laughed at Bozo the Clown.")
--
Chip Salzenberg - a.k.a. - <chip@pobox.com>
Poetry mode ... is the default.
Reply to:
- References:
- <rant> Package: ftpmasters, Severity: serious, ...
- From: Eduard Bloch <blade@debian.org>
- AMD64 for sarge [Re: <rant> Package: ftpmasters, Severity: serious, ...]
- From: Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>
- Re: AMD64 for sarge [Re: <rant> Package: ftpmasters, Severity: serious, ...]
- From: Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project Leader <leader@debian.org>
- Re: AMD64 for sarge [Re: <rant> Package: ftpmasters, Severity: serious, ...]
- From: Joel Baker <fenton@debian.org>
- Re: AMD64 for sarge [Re: <rant> Package: ftpmasters, Severity: serious, ...]
- From: Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org>