Re: AMD64 for sarge [Re: <rant> Package: ftpmasters, Severity: serious, ...]

[John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org>]

On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 11:04:17AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > On a more practical note, lib64 being a symlink doesn't affect all
> > programs that don't set a RPATH. Thus we can support quite a large
> > subset of existing ia32 software, without claiming LSB compliance for
> > ia32, which you can easily achieve anyway by installing a i386
> > distribution (or a chroot).
> 
> I was objecting to multiarch, not to the lib64 symlink.

Since amd64 as-is uses the lib64 symlink and not multiarch, where
exactly is your complaint with amd64 then?