[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: mass bug gnustep programs: policy violation



On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 02:32:31PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 10:35:34 +0200, Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org> said: 
>
>>* Matthew Palmer (mpalmer@debian.org) [040624 09:55]:
>>>So far, all I've seen is people saying that GNUstep doesn't need to
>>>follow Policy, which I cannot agree with.
>
>>No, I didn't say that. I just said that this behaviour is
>>1. an important, but not serious bug
>
>	If it violates policy, it is a serious bug.

I agree.

>       Whether or not it is RC depends on the RM.

I don't agree. It doesn't depend on the RM. The RM doesn't decide about
policy compliance.

>	manoj
>-- 
>One's own misdirected thought can do one more harm than an enemy or an
>ill-wisher. 42
>Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
>1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
>1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Regards,

Anibal Monsalve Salazar
--
 .''`.  Debian GNU/Linux      | Building 28C
: :' :  Free Operating System | Monash University VIC 3800, Australia
`. `'   http://debian.org/    | http://www-personal.monash.edu/~anibal/
  `-                          |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: