Re: What your ballot should look like if you're in favor of releasing sarge
On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 05:39:22AM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > Why did we instead vote on seemingly innocent editorial
> > changes that ended up implying a myriad of other things that turned out to
It was one change, but according to the new interpretation it implied that
several classes of data (documents, fonts, firmware?) are to be treated
> Because it was easy and non-controversial and, like you said, nobody
> expected the release manager to be using such a fucked up
> interpretation of the old SC to justify the old release policy.
Actually I expected a similar interpretation to justify the new release
> Really, trying to blame anybody but the one person who knew in advance
> is ridiculous.
Surely someone had some suspicions? I guess it's possible that only aj did,
but then it sounds weird to me that the release manager's ideas of
interpreting the SC match the ideas of 0 other developers. *sigh*
2. That which causes joy or happiness.