Re: What your ballot should look like if you're in favor of releasing sarge
* Josip Rodin (joy@srce.hr) [040623 21:55]:
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 10:36:46AM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote:
> > >> > as "grandfather resolutions" as described, and, by explicitly removing
> > >> > the Social Contract's requirement to have DFSG-free documentation and
> > >> > firmware for sarge/some-period-of-time/whatever, go back to allowing
> > >> > discretion on the part of those who would ordinarily be responsible for
> > >> > release issues and DFSG control.
> > >>
> > >> You're implying here that those things were allowed under a valid
> > >> interpretation of the original SC.
> > > You're implying here that there's only one possible "valid"
> > > interpretation of the original SC.
> > The probably with that interpretation, as has been pointed out
> > previously, is that there is a lot of gray area.
> And that's unthinkable since we're building an operating system that's
> used in a perfect world that has zero tolerance towards gray areas.
Don't you know that using facts in this discussion is deprecated?
Cheers,
Andi
Please add the appropriate :) or ;/ or ;( according to your own mind.
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
Reply to: