Re: What your ballot should look like if you're in favor of releasing sarge
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 04:43:29PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 05:35:07PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 12:41:04AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > It is precisely because we all agree on the importance of releasing
> > > sarge soon that we have proposed so many paths to reaching this goal.
> > > This is an effort to build consensus, not a lack of consensus on our
> > > part. Debian is a large community, and it's not easy to know what the
> > > outcome of such a vote will be before it happens. The range of ballot
> > > options has been provided partly in the hope that at least *one* among
> > > these options will receive the necessary support from developers and
> > > will put us back on the road to releasing sarge.
> >
> > This rely on the premices that at least some options will allow to release
> > sarge sooner. Unfortunately discussions on debian-vote involving the
> > release manager and the ctte had made clear to me that none of the
> > ballot options will have positive effect on the release of sarge, making
> > the exercise rather pointless, the reason being, all the options focus
> > on the previous SC change and side-step the real issue which is the
> > change of the release policy. I see no evidence that any changes of the
> > SC will imply change in the release policy allowing to release sarge
> > sooner.
>
> Can you please refer me to the discussions in question? As far as I can
> tell, both Steve and I (release assistants) have an entirely different
> impression, and between us we proposed some of the options on the
> ballot.
For example:
<http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2004/05/msg00220.html>
<http://lists.debian.org/debian-ctte/2004/06/msg00002.html>
<http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2004/05/msg00396.html>
Cheers,
--
Bill. <ballombe@debian.org>
Imagine a large red swirl here.
Reply to: