On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 08:33:43PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote: > tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes: > > > Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org> writes: > > > >> * Andrew Suffield (asuffield@debian.org) [040619 15:25]: > >> > Summary: you probably want 3 or 6. > >> Summary: I don't want a biased summary of someone who broke the > >> process of the release of sarge. > > > > Curious. Andrew Suffield all by himself? What about all those Debian > > voters that agreed with his proposal? Have you forgotten the 3:1 > > majority that agreed with Andrew? > > Well, most of those supporters probably did not believe the proposal > would or should have any effect on sarge's release. > > At least that was the case for me... It shouldn't have any effect on sarge's release, but lots of people started whining instead of fixing their packages... Sarge still has nearly 300 RC bugs so if those people would fix their packages it still could have no effect on the timetable of Sarge's release. Chris
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature