Re: fighting spam || avoiding spam

To: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
Cc: Debian Developers List <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: fighting spam || avoiding spam
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 13:46:58 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 87brjr1vpp.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.58.0406071707270.27070@cantor.unex.es> (Santiago Vila's message of "Mon, 7 Jun 2004 17:29:32 +0200 (CEST)")
References: <[🔎] 20040605204458.GA32199@riva.ucam.org> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.44.0406052325110.1404-100000@guadiana.unex.es> <[🔎] 20040606082118.GA4622@wonderland.linux.it> <[🔎] m38yezvoe0.fsf@wotan.attique.in> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.58.0406071707270.27070@cantor.unex.es>

* Santiago Vila:

> Would anyone second a General Resolution mandating the use of
> xbl.spamhaus.org in all MXs for debian.org?

I would rather see a free blacklisting service under Debian's control.

-- 
Current mail filters: many dial-up/DSL/cable modem hosts, and the
following domains: bigpond.com, di-ve.com, fuorissimo.com, hotmail.com,
jumpy.it, libero.it, netscape.net, postino.it, simplesnet.pt, spymac.com,
tiscali.co.uk, tiscali.cz, tiscali.it, voila.fr, yahoo.com.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: fighting spam || avoiding spam
  - From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>

References:
- Re: fighting spam || avoiding spam
  - From: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>
- Re: fighting spam || avoiding spam
  - From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
- Re: fighting spam || avoiding spam
  - From: Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT>
- Re: fighting spam || avoiding spam
  - From: Mathieu Roy <yeupou@coleumes.org>
- Re: fighting spam || avoiding spam
  - From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>

Prev by Date: Re: Auslaendergewalt: Herr Rau, wo waren Sie? [Incident: 040610-001950]
Next by Date: Re: fighting spam || avoiding spam
Previous by thread: Re: fighting spam || avoiding spam
Next by thread: Re: fighting spam || avoiding spam
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread